Tiny and very Republican, Wyoming is a Democratic player at last
CHEYENNE (AP) -- For decades, Democratic presidential candidates have largely ignored this heavily Republican state.
Now, with a razor-thin margin separating Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama, Wyoming suddenly finds itself relevant as the candidates scramble for the 12 delegates at stake in Saturday's caucus.
"In the grand scheme of things, Wyoming factors in for us," said Obama spokesman Matt Chandler. "We take it very seriously."
Only in the last few weeks have the campaigns stepped up their presence in the state. Both campaigns have set up offices, while calling voters and sending mailers. The first visits are planned for later this week. Former President Bill Clinton will be campaigning for his wife on Thursday, while Obama and Hillary Clinton will be attending events on Friday.
All the attention has Wyoming Democrats ecstatic.
"It's amazing. It's a once-in-a-generation type of opportunity for Wyoming to have a say in this presidential race," said party spokesman Bill Luckett.
Many say they haven't been this relevant since the 1960 Democratic National Convention, where 15 votes cast by Wyoming's delegation put John F. Kennedy over the top for the nomination.
"It's not like, 'Well, it's just Wyoming. We're going to write them off.' We do matter," said Cynthia Nunley, a Democrat from Lander. "We did in 1960 when we put Kennedy over the top, and we do this time because it is so close and our delegates can make a difference."
People all over the state want in on the action. The number of registered Democrats has grown by more than 1,000 since the start of the year, according to the Wyoming secretary of state's office. Currently Republicans have 136,000 registered voters, compared to 59,000 Democrats.
"People have contacted the campaign who are eager to help out. We're going to be harnessing that enthusiasm to really bring out the vote," said Clinton spokesman Blake Zeff.
It's not clear which candidate might have an edge. No public polling has been done. However, at least one prominent Wyoming Democrat has questioned whether Clinton's unpopularity would hurt other Democratic candidates in the West.
"I feel a lot of conservative Republicans may not show on Election Day to vote for Sen. (John) McCain, but they may show up to vote against her," said John Millin, state Democratic Party chair.
Millin's comments have sparked some controversy in the state.
"I think Chairman Millin is wrong. And I would go further. I would say it ill behooves the chairman of the Wyoming Democratic Party to rule out one of the two leading contenders for the office," said Kathy Karpan, a former Clinton administration appointee who served as director of the Office of Surface Mining in the Interior Department.
Karpan, who also served as Wyoming secretary of state, said Clinton has had "every aspect of her political life scrutinized" while less is known about Obama.
Meanwhile, the state's top Democrat, Gov. Dave Freudenthal, has said he doesn't like any of the candidates, Republican or Democratic.
Freudenthal doesn't think they've spoken enough about Western issues. He hasn't endorsed anyone and will not say who, as a superdelegate, he will vote for at the party's national convention.
"I just don't usually get involved in it. I may or may not," he said.
Freudenthal leans to the right, as do many Democrats in Wyoming. They include former state legislator Dick Sadler, of Casper, who wouldn't rule out voting for McCain.
"You'll find that the majority of the Democrats in Wyoming are just like they are anywhere else. They're fairly liberal," Sadler said. "But there are a certain faction of them that are pretty darn conservative. And thank God for that."
Yet some Republicans in Wyoming may be willing to move to the left come November - if Obama is the nominee. Mike Vinich, a bar owner in Hudson, said several of his Republican rancher friends have told him they'd vote for the Illinois senator.
"They just don't like McCain," Vinich said. "And the ranchers hate Hillary. They won't vote for her. Each one I've talked to (says), 'I don't want that woman in there, but Obama sounds promising."'
Reader Comments
crow wrote on Mar 10, 2008 1:51 AM:
Hillary? wrote on Mar 9, 2008 3:01 PM:
To Joe B wrote on Mar 9, 2008 2:59 PM:
Wyoming.... wrote on Mar 9, 2008 1:23 PM:
unhappy wrote on Mar 9, 2008 6:16 AM:
Don't let Republicans take the primary wrote on Mar 8, 2008 7:59 AM:
Wyoming is a republican state, not surprising they could arrange it so neatly.
Don't let the republicans control who the democratic nominee is - attend and participate "
Richard Fassler wrote on Mar 8, 2008 2:42 AM:
John wrote on Mar 8, 2008 1:13 AM:
The difference is that Bill Clinton started out with a LOT MORE EXPERIENCE than BarackO. I mean, there has to be a MINIMUM. Clinton was a 2 term Gov., JFK was a 4 term Congressman, 2 terms Senator & WAR HERO. Obama has none of those credentials. IN FACT, he has NO CREDENTIALS to speak of at all. All this fiction of all these bills he passed--voted on, co-sponsored with like 40 other people). In the senate, he passed TWO BILLS. TWO. That's it. To promote democracy in the Congo and to name a post office. That is the sum total of his legislative experience. Illinois? Don't even bring it up! Voting "PRESENT"--how many times? 10? 20? NO ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY TIMES!!!
This guy has done nothing, accomplished nothing and it is ALL EGO. Why is he running? Why not wait a few years and get a little experience? NO. He is an opportunist, a plagiarizer, a thief (Read "Obama & Me"-Houston Press about putting his name on other Senator's bills--)
Isn't that the same thing all over again? Taking credit for someone else's work, cheating (NAFTA-gate)
This guy is the bottom of the barrel. "
Marie wrote on Mar 7, 2008 11:15 PM:
Now they are crossing over to "pose" as democrats and trying to influence voters to vote for Hillary on these "comment" posts.
The republicans know that they can not defeat Obama! In polls, he is beating John McCain by 10% to 12% in the big election Hillary would lose by 6%. Listen to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, etc. They talk about this strategy all the time. It's a real, happening plot.
Look again at a lot of the "over the top" commentary being posted here in support of Hillary. ..... No, I take that back.....posted here in attack of Barack Obama! ....
Many of them are "fake" Democrats looking to get the WEAKEST candidate nominated. That would be Hillary Clinton!
Obama is keeping his campaign on a high level. Hillary (and her supporters learn from her!) has been trying to drag him down, with her, into the mud.... get him dirty, make him look just as corrupt as she is.
Let's learn from Barack,....let our posts for Obama stay on the High road. "
Jason wrote on Mar 7, 2008 11:03 PM:
Look at the previous administration of the Clintons which equaled jobs, a budget surplus so what if Bill got his in the Oval office that is between him God and Hillary. I commend them for what they have done for this country. Obama always for the most part during the debates agrees with what Hillary says? Can he not make up his own mind? I think Hillary is a very viable choice for keeping our private land just that private. Our federal lands and parks protected. Which is another thing that Bill did while he was in the WH matter of point he opened up more lands to the people, unlike current administration locking them down for oil production which is what Obama wants to continue. Our federal lands were set aside for the people NOT BIG BUSINESS and oil production. VOTE HILLARY she is the only one who really cares for ranchers and for our lands "
Ralphinphnx wrote on Mar 7, 2008 10:09 PM:
got its 15 Seconds of
Fame with a short
visit from Democratic
Presidential Candidates Con Man
Barack Hussein Obama
and Senator Hillary
Clinton,so why hasn't
Bush Lite Amnesty John
McCain showed up and
gave you some to his
"Forked Tongue Express
Talk" by now as well? "
Joe B wrote on Mar 7, 2008 9:12 PM:
Wyoming Realist wrote on Mar 7, 2008 7:12 PM:
WYOMING IS A RED STATE ANYWAY wrote on Mar 7, 2008 6:17 PM:
They will all vote for republican John McCain in November regardless ! aso it does not really matter at all! "
DFK wrote on Mar 7, 2008 5:37 PM:
Alyssa Lawson wrote on Mar 7, 2008 3:02 PM:
S.D. Gordon wrote on Mar 7, 2008 2:57 PM:
mr wrote on Mar 7, 2008 1:22 PM:
Marie wrote on Mar 7, 2008 10:56 AM:
Dan wrote on Mar 7, 2008 7:16 AM:
looker wrote on Mar 7, 2008 6:18 AM:
A.C. wrote on Mar 7, 2008 2:33 AM:
lukas wrote on Mar 7, 2008 12:26 AM:
A corruption trial of his former fundraiser Antoin "Tony" Rezko on charges of influence peddling began in Chicago this past week.
"
K.H. wrote on Mar 7, 2008 12:14 AM:
John Able wrote on Mar 6, 2008 11:33 PM:
Have a good summer hope you get some rain and have enough hay. We have been drenched so may continue into summer "
mj wrote on Mar 6, 2008 9:34 PM:
"
Helen Munsch wrote on Mar 6, 2008 8:05 PM:
There are many people who travel the country and make speeches as a living. Some are motivational speakers, others are professionals in their fields sharing their expertise. Why shouldn't Bill get paid for sharing his expertise. The country was in great shape during his presidency. Have you ever given it much thought as to how much Bush has raked in since residing in the oval office for 8 years? I'm sure he's made a lot of money for his buddies and himself and has run this country into huge debt our children and grandchildren shall have to bear, damaged the respect and integrity of this country, diminished the middle class, continues to support outsourcing of jobs to foreign countries, opened the doors to immigration because he said it was good for business and the economy, and allowed the Congress to spend money from Social Security. Do you really think he'll be able to get paid to talk about his term in the oval office? "
ob wrote on Mar 6, 2008 7:06 PM:
John C. Pickett, Indiana wrote on Mar 6, 2008 6:00 PM:
Elizabeth wrote on Mar 6, 2008 5:35 PM:
Thank you. GO WYOMING!
Obama 2008,
Elizabeth from Texas "
rancher wrote on Mar 6, 2008 5:29 PM:
Annie May wrote on Mar 6, 2008 4:22 PM:
Go Anyone but Hillary wrote on Mar 6, 2008 4:05 PM:
cross eyed mary wrote on Mar 6, 2008 3:59 PM:
s.b. wrote on Mar 6, 2008 3:37 PM:
Leave Your Comments
|
There is a 200 word limitation per post Comments are not posted until after being approved by WTE staff. Comments may be rejected by the WTE staff at their discretion. The comments posted on the Reader Comments section are not necessarily those of the WTE. If you would like to report an offensive post, please contact us. |




Kiley wrote on Mar 11, 2008 11:44 AM: