WTE Home
55°F
Clear
5 Day Forecast
HOME NEWS | SPORTS | OPINION | OBITUARIES | CLASSIFIEDS | COMMUNITY | REAL ESTATE | SUBSCRIBER | ADVERTISING | WEB SERVICES | CONTACT US | RSS

Most Commented

Local News Updates

Story Tools

Printable Version | Email This Story | Smaller Text Text Size Larger Text | 40 comment(s)

Vaccine overkill?

By Baylie Davis
bdavis@wyomingnews.com

CHEYENNE -- Even though city residents might have the option of getting rabies vaccines for their pets that last three years, according to city ordinance, the vaccine has to be administered every year.

There are two types of vaccines available. The only difference between them is how long they’ve been proven effective, Wyoming State Veterinarian Walter Cook said.

A one-year vaccine might be the same formula as the three-year vaccine, but it may or may not work as long, he said.

Depending on what the dog owner asks for and what the veterinarian has available, pets can be vaccinated with either type.

But even if the animal gets the three-year vaccine, the city requires that rabies tags be updated every year, which means a new shot every year.

Cook said the state will recognize the three-year vaccination, but local jurisdictions are allowed to make their own rules.

In Cheyenne, a yearly update is required; in the county, the tags must be updated based on “current veterinary standards,” said Paula Cook, Cheyenne and Laramie County animal control supervisor. That means a three-year vaccine is current for three years outside of Cheyenne.

Paula Cook said ensuring accountability is one reason for requiring a yearly update in Cheyenne. It’s a lot harder to keep track of vaccine records for three years than for one year, and it’s harder to determine if they’re current, she said.

The bottom line, Cheyenne Animal Shelter Executive Director Rick Collord said, is there are two schools of thought among experts: one, that requiring yearly vaccinations is overkill; the other that requiring yearly vaccines is safer and more reliable.

Collord said he tends to agree with the latter, after having been through a rabies outbreak in Texas.

“My main concern is that we don’t get a rabies outbreak,” he said, adding that requiring a yearly vaccination means people are less likely to forget about it.

For people who can remember to do the vaccination every three years, however, the yearly requirement might feel excessive. But for those who have trouble remembering to follow even a yearly schedule, a three-year schedule might be even harder.

Frontier Veterinary Center head veterinary technician Amanda Adsit said using the three-year vaccine is “sort of like insurance” because they have a few clients who don’t follow the yearly schedule, despite the ordinance. This way, they know the dogs are protected for three years, even though they may get fined by the city for out-of-date tags.

The cost of yearly visits is one concern of pet owners at Frontier, Adsit said.

The vaccine itself only costs $16 there, but an office visit costs $46, and other vaccines can increase the price also. Plus, it isn’t always convenient to make an appointment, coax Fido into the backseat, hold him down when he sees the cats in the office and then hold him down some more when it’s time for the needle.

Some people are pretty vocal about their frustration with having to come in every year, even though they get a three-year vaccine at Frontier, Adsit said.

Another concern pet owners have is whether their dogs could get sick from getting a vaccine every year that is meant to last for three years.

Walter Cook said there is no danger of that. In fact, dogs that have been exposed to other animals with rabies will often be given another vaccination, even if theirs is current, just to make sure they don’t get sick.

Having a tag with the animal’s current veterinarian on it also is valuable if the dog gets lost, hit by a car or needs to be taken to a vet quickly, Paula Cook and Dr. Christopher Church, a veterinarian at the Cheyenne Pet Clinic, added.

Not having current tags “wastes precious time” in getting the animal taken care of, Paula Cook said.

Although she said she felt the one-year ordinance was reasonable, Paula Cook added that if the law would allow it, she doesn’t see any problem with three-year vaccines having tags that last three years.

“What the law says and what we can do are two different things,” she said.

Walter Cook recommends that curious pet owners ask about the vaccine that their dog will receive. The type, whether three-year or one-year, can be found on the label of the vaccine itself.

Mayor Jack Spiker said the issue of how often vaccinations are necessary has come up several times in the City Council, and that he didn’t have a good answer for why the city requires a yearly vaccination.

“I would take a lead from the animal shelter folks,” he said. “If we had a recommendation from the animal shelter and the board, we’d certainly amend our ordinance to reflect that.”




Reader Comments

Heather Minnich wrote on May 25, 2009 2:04 PM:

" A three year vaccine is has been *tested* to last three years. Current testing may prove they last longer.

Ronald Schultz said that you don't gain anything by boostering a 3-year rabies shot ever 1-2 years rather than three, but you do risk the health of your animal.

If your city/county requires licensing *every* year along with a valid rabies vaccine, then each year when they register their dog, they'll know if the dog is due or not for rabies vaccine.

Most good vets send out reminds for rabies and other vaccines. It works for cities much larger than any in WY!

Like someone already posted, it's unlikely that a dog that's rec'd their initial rabies booster at 3-6 months old followed with another a year laster is ever going to get rabies, even if exposed.

C'mon Cheyenne and the rest of WY, let's get current with the times on rabies vaccines! "

steve jackson wrote on Jun 3, 2008 8:57 PM:

" Cheyenne needs to get with the program. If you can track a one year vaccination, and you can count, then you will be able to track a three year. Not rocket science. City council needs to be euthanized sooner then later. They need younger blood on that council! "

I won't vaccinate wrote on Mar 31, 2008 1:19 PM:

" I have a 14 yr old dog and I refuse to put him threw another rabies vaccine. Their have been many articles out that state older dogs doing well and then shortly after having them revaccinated becoming very ill and having to be put down. I won't have that happen. Besides at 14 he's a mello fello taking one day at a time. Gentle, and wise. "

NEB wrote on Mar 31, 2008 1:13 PM:

" The Seatbelt las is a Giant money machine for cities and towns. Ask lawmakers why 40 Million kids can ride a school bus twice a day without seatbelts. "

EmilyS wrote on Mar 30, 2008 2:18 PM:

" The negative comments about Mayor Spiker seem to have missed the point in the article that he himself is a dog owners, seemed concerned and is willing to re open discussion. The problem is that he is listening to "experts" who (at least if quoted correctly) are not giving truthful information (like the quote from State Vet Cook).

We should push the city council to address this. "

Kris L. Christine wrote on Mar 30, 2008 9:31 AM:

" How many rabies vaccinations has your dog had to date?

The following quote is from the Center for Disease Control's MMWR Recommendations and Reports March 22, 1991/40(RR03);1-19 Rabies Prevention-- United States, 1991 Recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee
"A fully vaccinated dog or cat is unlikely to become infected with rabies, although rare cases have been reported (48). In a nationwide study of rabies among dogs and cats in 1988, only one dog and two cats that were vaccinated contracted rabies (49). All three of these animals had received only single doses of vaccine; no documented vaccine failures occurred among dogs or cats that had received two vaccinations. " "

concerned pet owner wrote on Mar 30, 2008 9:01 AM:

" We all should be aware that if the change is made require the vaccine less often - the clinics are going to raise the price to re-cover their loss. Our pets suffer all the way around at the hands of others....... "

Work at City Hall wrote on Mar 29, 2008 12:01 PM:

" We need job security at the city anyway we can get it because there is no job security here with the Spike or the Collinare "

JJ wrote on Mar 29, 2008 7:44 AM:

" Ralphinphnx gets to the bottom of the problem yet again! Of course it's the mayors fault! We should fire the chief of police too since, in Ralph's not so humble opinion, he too is at the root of all of Cheyennes problems. "

Animal rescuer wrote on Mar 28, 2008 8:27 AM:

" "A one-year vaccine might be the same formula as the three-year vaccine, but it may or may not work as long, he said."
This comment from our State Vet? If it is the same formula, and it is, then why would one think it won't work as long. Dr. Cook, you surely don't believe this statement? Can we get a new State Vet with the new law? Other cities, counties and states have 3 year vaccine requirements and ONE YEAR licensing. It works for them; why not Cheyenne? Follow the money! Everytime! Stop making our dogs and cats sick with laws based on greed and ignorance. "

Ralphinphnx wrote on Mar 27, 2008 10:56 PM:

" So does this ordinance
also cover and require
mandatory rabies and
distemper shots for
Mayor Skywalker and the City Council? If
so did anyone check to
see if their shots are
all current? As we sure don't want some
local resident or a
tourist to get bit by
one of them,do we? "

patriciajordan wrote on Mar 27, 2008 7:21 PM:

" Yearly vaccines have been known to NOT BE necessary since 1992.The reason they ever started being required yearly came out of a round table discussion at the AVMA, with not one researcher or one feline veterinarian on the table discussion.There was never any research done to start requiring yearly vaccines.They remain to this day one of the largest scams on the pet owning public. Another thing that is done and is unethical is that there is no INFORMED CONSENT and certainly no FULL DISCLOSURE for the client the damage that this innoculation can cause, the cancer, the auto-immune disease the development of auto-antibodies and the inset of genetic mutation and the chronic disease, the assault of the immune system.I am a veterinarian and I see the vaccination procedure as the most deadly dangerous medical procedure done on a daily basis in just about every veterinary facility. I am ashamed that this hoax has not been forced to be stopped and the fallicy of vaccination exposed for what it is.Dr. Ron Schultz has stated the the mere imprinting of the animal immune system at around 15-16 weeks of age even just one time is suffecient for the lifetime of the animal. "

patricia jordan wrote on Mar 27, 2008 7:10 PM:

" I am a veterinarian and i see on a daily basis the collateral damage of requiring a yearly immune assault on our comapnion animals. Dr. Jean Dodds has agreed that every time a vaccine is delivered, mutations to the vaccinates genetics occur.Rabies vaccines have been shown to provide at least 5 years of immunity and we have a challenge study for the 7 and 10 year study.However, the safety of over vaccinating has never been studied.Instead we have the higest number of adverse vaccines events with the rabies vaccines, we have known auto-immune disease,we have known cancers from p53 supression of the vaccinates genome from the adjuvants in the vaccines.We have the MAJORITY of internal medicine cases in the companion animals coming out of the outdated yearly administration of vaccines.The AVMA has ststed the dogs immune system is not unlike the humans.Drs. Schultz and Dodds have researched the dire adverse effects of overvaccinating.IF the humans get at least 50 years of immunity with viral vaccines like that to small pox, why would you vaccinate yearly???I have asked public health veterinarians this and they have all quiply replied that animals are disposable! "

City Employee wrote on Mar 27, 2008 3:58 PM:

" The whole city council needs to be vacinated they all keep biting me in the butt ! "

Luv that Mayor wrote on Mar 27, 2008 2:49 PM:

" So Spriker is going to take his lead from the animal shelter, Thank you Lord that Alan Cohen and the Cheyenne solution are gone. "

Greg Dyer wrote on Mar 27, 2008 12:14 PM:

" Wow..Government for our own good! I guess it depends on what side of the street you live on. What's good for the county is'nt good enough for the city? And at what costs? Be it $$ or our pets health? "Paula Cook said ensuring accountability is one reason for requiring a yearly update in Cheyenne. It’s a lot harder to keep track of vaccine records for three years than for one year, and it’s harder to determine if they’re current, she said."
Again Wow.. So I guess three times the paper work is easier(one year as opposed to three years)? Is it more about paper work than our pets health?
Come on Cheyenne get with the norm!
















"

Pamela Picard wrote on Mar 27, 2008 9:15 AM:

" Dr. Michel Aubert proved in 1992 that any dog or cat with two rabies vaccinations has a less than 1 in 8 million chance of contracting the virus if exposed. You by contrast have a better than 1 in 600,000 chance of being struck by lightning in a thunderstorm. Other scientific data prove that there is no benefit to repeat rabies vaccine. Antigens do not increase Immunity is not enhanced. Laws that mandate rabies vaccination as a requirement for city licenses violate consumer protection laws and should be challenged as illegal. "

Reader wrote on Mar 27, 2008 3:52 AM:

" Paula Cook said, "It’s a lot harder to keep track of vaccine records for three years than for one year, and it’s harder to determine if they’re current." Do people often have trouble adding and subtracting by numbers less than 4 when determining if vaccines are current? That is sad! "

B Patterson wrote on Mar 26, 2008 11:47 PM:

" As far as I can see, the only reason the City of Cheyenne requires an annual rabies vaccine is to receive the "licensing " portion of the fee. In Laramie County (which does not require licensing) a 3-year schedule is acceptable. The problem is that the veterinarians in the City do not recognize "out of city" addresses, so will issue only a 1-year certificate for the same vaccine for which a non-city veterinarian will issue a 3-year certificate. And the dogs are the ones who reap the ill-health from this unfair scenario. "

Christine wrote on Mar 26, 2008 10:40 PM:

" Although it may be an inconvience to take your dog to the Vet once a year, you may not see positive side. We often put your pets health care last and visiting the vet once a year is a great way to keep up on new ways to keep your pet healthy. While you are there you can ask for a simple Fecal Float which takes only minutes. This test will determine whether or not your pet has parasites, some of which can be pasted on to you and your family.
"Sickness" from vaccines is rare in dogs and the benifits of a yearly exam, in my opinion, far out way the harm. In cats it is a different story all together. Cats can have aggressive inoperatable fibro sarcomas form that can be fatal. This can be avoided by having vet give your cat its rabies shot in the rear leg. This way if the tumor forms they may only lose a leg. If you are still worried you can ask for "Adjuvant Free" vaccine. This vaccine is more costley but does not contain the detergent that is often associated with these tumors. "

Ralphinphnx wrote on Mar 26, 2008 9:56 PM:

" So anyone know if Mayor Skywalker Spiker
and anyone on the
Cheyenne City Council
own any Vetinary Drug
Company Stocks? Or is
this all just more
proof of Skywalker's
total incompetence? "

Kris L. Christine wrote on Mar 26, 2008 9:52 AM:

" 1992 research demonstrated dogs were immune to a rabies challenge (research challenges inject dogs with high doses of virulent virus) 5 years after vaccination. Study text, Practical Significance of Rabies Antibodies in Cats and Dogs and Results of a Survey on Rabies Vaccination and Quarantine for Domestic Carnivora in Western Europe, at http://www.britfeld.com/rabies.htm

August 2003, Journal of Veterinary Medicine, Series A vol.50#6, pp. 286-291(6) study, Fibrosarcomas at Presumed Sites of Injection in Dogs, documenting cancerous tumors at presumed rabies vaccine injection sites in dogs. "In both dogs and cats, the development of necrotizing panniculitis at sites of rabies vaccine administration was first observed by Hendrick & Dunagan (1992)." http://www.britfeld.com/cancers.htm

Dr. Ronald Schultz, University of Wisconsin School of Veterinary Medicine, whose canine vaccine studies form part of the scientific base for the 2003, 2006 American Animal Hospital Association's Canine Vaccine Guidelines and the 2007 World Small Animal Veterinary Association's Vaccine Guidelines, published rabies serological studies showing dogs have anitibody titer counts at levels known to confer immunity 7 years after vaccination -- Duration of Immunity to Canine Vaccines: What We Know and Don't Know, Dr. Ronald Schultz http://www.cedarbayvet.com/duration_of_immunity.htm "

Brenda D. wrote on Mar 26, 2008 9:03 AM:

" Since there is a 3 year vacination available there is no reason to vacinate yearly,thus raising the price of health care for our animals. We as humans to not have to be vacinated yearly so why should our pets? "

Stacy wrote on Mar 26, 2008 8:51 AM:

" I take my pets in for vaccination yearly. At the same time, they recive their annual health exams. As a pet owner, this is important to me. If Cheyenne started using the three year rabies vaccine, my pets would still go to the vet once a year for check-ups.

I believe that pets, like kids, should be given pro-active health care instead of only taking them to the vet when they are ill, regardless of the vaccination schedule.

I definately don't fit in the high-income range, but it is my responsibility as a pet owner to be sure that pet care expenses are scheduled into my budget every year.

If one can't afford pet care, but chooses to have pets, there are sacrifices that need to be made to maintian the health of those pets. Adjust your expenses to make sure that you can afford veterinary care. Consider downgrading to basic cable, or getting rid of your cell phone. Cut out unnecessary costs. If you don't have enough room in your budget to make this happen, you probably can't afford pet care at this time. "

CGR wrote on Mar 26, 2008 8:49 AM:

" There is much research to support a new way to look at vaccinating our dogs. One only needs to look!! More and more DVM that are keeping up with their field are finding profound health risks associated with over vaccinating. "

Geez wrote on Mar 26, 2008 7:17 AM:

" Guess what Cheyenne, your local Vets. are now pushing Deworming of your pet. They have no idea if your pet has worms, its just something they feel needs done. This is a drug that can damage all their organs in one shot. "

The Guardian wrote on Mar 26, 2008 7:06 AM:

" The yearly RABIES shot is also the yearly DOG license. So how much of this shot fee is passed onto the city. (This is more the reason why its yearly rather than the norm. which is three years.) This City has more ways to dig into you pocket than one would care to think about. I know one thing, they have worn holes in my pockets. Lets have change! Change is good!!! "

Judith Callender wrote on Mar 26, 2008 6:35 AM:

" It has been unnecessary for many years now for vets to give an annual rabies vaccination. The drug companies clearly have tested that the serum provided to vets is more than adequate protection for three years or longer. Currently Dr. Jean Dodds is undertaking an extensive testing to show that the protection really lasts for more than seven years. Not only is it unnecessary to give the rabies vaccination annually, it is adversely affecting our dogs' health to do so. The City needs to look at the advances and recognize that the by law needs to be changed to three years. "

Kris L. Christine wrote on Mar 26, 2008 4:21 AM:

" http://www.critteradvocacy.org/The%20White%20Paper.htm

In an attempt to see if a difference in delinquency rates exists between states requiring rabies vaccination each year (one-year states) and states requiring rabies vaccinations every three years (three-year states), the Texas Department of Health obtained data from Banfield Corp., which owns VetSmart. Banfield Corp. provided data from seven states where they have clinics (Texas and Florida which are one-year states and Arizona, California, Illinois, North Carolina, and South Carolina which are three-year states). The data contained the vaccination status of 1,600,000 dogs and 582,000 cats based on a form completed by the veterinarian indicating if the vaccine was administered early, late, or on time.

When looking at the data for the people who elected to have their pets receive rabies vaccination only and no other preventive care, comparison of the one-year states and the three-year states demonstrates no difference in the delinquency rates. "

Christine wrote on Mar 25, 2008 5:50 PM:

" The Cheyenne ordinance is way behind the times. They are working now on proving the vacc. is effective for 5 years and 7 years when that study is completed and Cheyenne is still wanting to jab the dogs every year. This has no medical or scientific basis as all, plus this type of over vaccination has harmful side effects. Is this the same Human Organization whose only solution to an outbreak of the dog flu was euthanizing the dogs? In that case I seriously doubt their misguided guidance in this matter. They are more worried about record keeping than the health of the dog by what I saw in the article.

A Wyoming resident but luckily not Cheyenne,
Christine B. "

JJN wrote on Mar 25, 2008 3:43 PM:

" I want to keep my dog safe and healthy, but if a vaccine is not necessary every year, then the law needs to be changed. "

Wyo Hunter wrote on Mar 25, 2008 2:23 PM:

" I have long heard that over-vaccinating dogs has lead to health troubles and shortened lives of our pets. It seems to me that if the vaccine is good for 3-7 years, why bother annually unless it is merely to line the pockets of the vets. My research shows that we give our pets far more vaccines than they need. I thank the city of Cheyenne for believing me to be too stupid to remember to get my dog's shots, and for believing that vets can't go to the trouble to send me a card when appropriate to remind me. "

Karon Volk wrote on Mar 25, 2008 1:53 PM:

" Cudos to WTE for having the courage to write this story. Hoping that we can change the foolish annual vaccination law here in Wyoming as well as Nationally. Some States are further ahead than otheres, bu it is just a matter of time, and people opposing current regulations.
Karon Volk "

Kris L. Christine wrote on Mar 25, 2008 11:24 AM:

" The rabies vaccine is the most potent of the veterinary vaccines and associated with significant adverse reactions -- it should not be given more often than is necessary to maintain immunity. Adverse reactions such as autoimmune diseases affecting the thyroid, joints, blood, eyes, skin, kidney, liver, bowel and central nervous system; anaphylactic shock; aggression; seizures; epilepsy; and fibrosarcomas at injection sites are linked to rabies vaccinations.


The National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians’ Compendium of Animal Rabies Prevention and Control, 2007 (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr5603.pdf ) states: “No laboratory or epidemiologic data exist to support the annual or biennial administration of 3- or 4-year vaccines following the initial series.”



Many, if not most or all, annual rabies vaccines are 3 year vaccines relabeled -- Colorado State University's Small Animal Vaccination Protocol for its veterinary teaching hospital states: “Even with rabies vaccines, the label may be misleading in that a three year duration of immunity product may also be labeled and sold as a one year duration of immunity product.”



More information on the rabies vaccine see THE RABIES CHALLENGE FUND website at www.RabiesChallengeFund.org.
"

definately wrote on Mar 23, 2008 7:46 PM:

" great idea to have all animals vaccinated. Just in case they get picked up and go to the shelter and get dog flu and the knee jerk reaction is to mass kill everything. Just like not too long ago in fact. And thanks to Spiker, I could live in one of the unincorporated blocks of county land in the middle of the city and let my dog bark non-stop and not have to worry about the barking dawg law. I love it "

Dog Lover wrote on Mar 23, 2008 7:01 PM:

" I have been frustrated for many years about the need to have my animals vaccinated EVERY year. I have in the past tried to see about having a low-cost vaccine clinic since the city is making this a manditory thing. I have contacted quite a few Vets and did not have any of them, (except one who has left Cheyenne, Ms. Lawler) offer to do this vaccine clinic for our community. That is a shame!!! The Vets do expect that to be a good pet owner you must line their pockets every year with a fee (vaccininations) to be compliant. Now that there is a new law that if your animal happens to bite anyone, no matter why the reason, and it does not have proof of being vaccinated in that year, it will be destroyed, makes it more of a nightmare to people who love their pets!!! Come on Cheyenne Vets, get on the ball and help people of need to keep up with your standards of pet health. Show pet owners that you can and will help out with this issue. If not, then Mayor Spiker, you need to see to over-ruling this ordinance in Cheyenne. "

KMB wrote on Mar 23, 2008 6:30 PM:

" I had never heard of 3 yr vaccines until I started doing dog rescue from other states.

Again, Cheyenne is behind the times. "

EmilyS wrote on Mar 23, 2008 6:23 PM:

" There are several things the "experts" Mayor Spiker depends on aren't telling him. One: the manufacturer guarantees the safety and effectiveness of the 3 year rabies vax, which has been scientifically proven. Two: EVERY vet school and professional vet school references the 3 year vax as safe and effective. The use of the rabies tag for pet identification or the one year requirement to "remind" owners to vaccinate are not the reason we vaccinate against rabies. The reason is for public health, and the one year requirement is not justified for any public health reason. And by the way: there is no scientific justification for the OTHER yearly vax Cheyenne vets push on their patients. "

Judy Loudin wrote on Mar 23, 2008 12:42 PM:

" It is a well known fact that giving animals vaccinations too often produces vaccinosis and greatly shortens the animals' life. It is just a money game with many veterinarians. Dr. Ronald Schultz of the University of WI Vet School has done studies which show that rabies vaccinations can last up to 5-7 years. More studies are in progress to verify the truth of the first studies. Over-vaccination can result in serious adverse reactions affecting the joints, thyroid, skin, kidney, liver, cancer and nervous system. Google Rabies vaccinations and studies and learn for yourself how dangerous overvaccination is. Well informed people can help their animals companions maintain good health and longer, happier lives.My vet in Laramie tells me the one-year and three year vaccines are exactly the same potency. Please Mayor Spiker and Council: stop the killing and change the law for the city of Cheyenne. "

D Walker wrote on Mar 23, 2008 11:03 AM:

" The arguments used for having a yearly vaccine do not seem to hold water. My vet ( Frontier Veterinary Clinic) sends a card when the vacinations are due. If your pet wears a tag at least you know the year the shots are due, rabies are not the only shots that are needed. The others need to be given yearly.Reguardless of a need for the shots yearly or every three years having pets is expensive. The city is now thinking about passing an ordinance to have all pets micro-chipped. This is also expensive and painful for small dogs especially. This would even make it harder for low & fixed income families to have pets. A savings of having the shot every 3 years, when it works just fine, would be worth it in the long run ($ 62.00) per year for one animal. "

Leave Your Comments

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

There is a 200 word limitation per post

Comments are not posted until after being approved by WTE staff.

Comments may be rejected by the WTE staff at their discretion.

The comments posted on the Reader Comments section are not necessarily those of the WTE.

If you would like to report an offensive post, please contact us.


Advertisement