WTE Home
55°F
Clear
5 Day Forecast
HOME NEWS | SPORTS | OPINION | OBITUARIES | CLASSIFIEDS | COMMUNITY | REAL ESTATE | SUBSCRIBER | ADVERTISING | WEB SERVICES | CONTACT US | RSS

Most Commented

News

Story Tools

Printable Version | Email This Story | Smaller Text Text Size Larger Text | 48 comment(s)

Changes to vaccine ordinance unlikely

Right now, the city requires that rabies tags be updated every year -- which means a new shot annually even though there is a vaccination that is proven to last for three years.

By Baylie Davis
bdavis@wyomingnews.com

CHEYENNE -- Despite urging from some pet owners, the city ordinance for rabies vaccinations isn't likely to change any time in the near future, officials say.

There has been some question as to whether vaccinating pets for rabies every year is necessary -- or even is healthy.

Even among veterinarians, there isn't a consensus.

Right now the city requires that rabies tags be updated every year. That means a new shot annually even though there is a vaccination that is proven to last for three.

There are several reasons city officials cite for the requirement. Those include: proper identification and registration of the animals; and ensuring that residents don't forget to vaccinate.

Laramie County resident Karon Volk is a pet owner and supporter of the Rabies Challenge Fund, an organization that tests the duration of the rabies vaccine.

She says the yearly requirement is overkill and may be dangerous to pets.

The results of the studies, which won't be published for five years, have found that the currently rabies vaccine provides immunity for much longer than one year, possibly even longer than seven years, she said.

The fund also has found that the vaccine can cause some adverse reactions like tumors and illness, Volk added.

In a special report by the Center for Veterinary Biologics in the Journal of American Veterinary Medicine Association, between 2004 and 2007 there were 246 adverse events reported after a dog was given a rabies vaccine.

But it later states that in nearly 72 percent of those reports, another vaccine or medication was administered at the same time, and it was generally not possible to determine which product was the cause of the reaction.

The report concluded: "findings ... do not suggest a high frequency or unexpected pattern of adverse events associated with the use of rabies vaccines in veterinary medicine."

Walter Cook, state veterinarian, said he has polled different vets in the state who do a lot of vaccinations, and "no one has reported any serious side effects."

There are other vaccines and medications that are more likely to cause reactions, but "the rabies vaccine has just not been associated with very many side effects," he said.

But Volk said many veterinary offices rely on the income they get from seeing patients every year, so there is likely an under-reporting of the adverse effects.

Cook said vets are required to report any side effects so the vaccine can be studied. He would be "absolutely shocked," he said, if any doctors were putting animals at risk just to make a profit.

Volk has written to city officials, asking them to re-examine the yearly requirement.

Although she lives outside of the city, where the requirement is that the vaccine be updated according to the label -- which is sometimes three years -- she has friends and family in the city who she says are subjected to an unhealthy law.

"I raise Irish wolfhounds, and because of this regulation, (I) would not consider placing any of my puppies in the city," she wrote Mayor Jack Spiker.

He responded that although his office has gotten a lot of calls about the issue, he will take guidance from the leaders at the Cheyenne Animal Shelter in making any changes.

Shelter director Rick Collard said, "We have not had anything that shows there's an issue here in this community."

The shelter is busy responding to barking or stray dogs or breeding cat complaints in the city, he said.

"We're a bit overwhelmed with those kinds of complaints right now," he said.

City Council President Don Pierson has agreed to research the issue and to consider re-examining the ordinance.

"I am not ready to introduce any ordinances or resolutions on the subject at this time but may in the future," he said.

Also, state Rep. Pete Illoway, R-Cheyenne, has asked the mayor to re-examine the ordinance.

"I do not think that the ease of looking at a tag or the ease for animal control officers is a sufficient reason for requiring yearly rabies shots," he wrote to Spiker.

"The citizens are asking you and the council to take a good look, have some meetings, hearings, etc. and make a determination."

The studies that are being done now might prove the vaccine need not be -- or shouldn't be -- administered every year.

Cook said that after those are complete, the National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians may test and accept the results of those studies.

"If they're satisfied with those studies, we might very well see some changes (in coming years)," he said.

What is rabies?

According to the National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians and the Center for Disease Control, rabies is a "fatal viral zoonosis and a serious public health problem." The CDC's rabies Web site says, "Early symptoms of rabies in humans are nonspecific, consisting of fever, headache, and general malaise. As the disease progresses, neurological symptoms appear and may include insomnia, anxiety, confusion, slight or partial paralysis, excitation, hallucinations, agitation, hypersalivation, difficulty swallowing and hydrophobia (fear of water). Death usually occurs within days of the onset of symptoms." Although it is fairly rare for pets to contract the disease, (domestic animals account for less than 10 percent of reported cases) it is more common for wild animals to carry it. Thus, if your pets are exposed to wild animals that could bite or scratch it, they could be in danger. "Unvaccinated dogs, cats and ferrets exposed to a rabid animal should be euthanized immediately," the CDC says.




Reader Comments

Why wrote on Apr 17, 2008 6:10 PM:

" If were not going to vacinate city council why vacinate the dogs "

Karon wrote on Apr 17, 2008 9:35 AM:

" We have not given up on this issue. I remain hopeful that Mayor Spiker and the City Council staff will do as promised and research the issue. Once that is done, they can come to no other conclusion than to change the annual vaccine requirement to every 3 years. Please continue to write to Mayor Spiker and City Council members to ensure they are aware of your feelings on this matter. If they read the studies, they will have no choice but to agree these changes must be made, despite the opinions of the "experts" they are currently relying on.
Thank you. "

P. Jordan wrote on Apr 17, 2008 5:07 AM:

" I just returned from a veterinary talk about vaccines and the speaker was Dr. Ron Schultz foremost veterinary vaccine researcher and foremost AUTHORITY on the topic this very forum is debating, I will relay the message from Dr. Ron Schultz of Wisconsin's Veterinary School, TALK TOT EH PEOPLE WHO HAVE DONE THE STUDIES! Your city officials should not speak to vets out of touch with the facts, have them go directly to Dr. Ron Schultz of Wisconsin's Veterinary School, Dr. Dennis Macy Oncologist at Colorado's Veterinary School and Dr. Jean Dodds of Hemopet, have them talk to scientists/researchers/veterinarians who know THE FACTS AND DID THE STUDIES. Veterinarians who are living in a past era of ignorance on what "vaccinology"actually is, living a lifestyle of vaccine based practices of course are going to be the only opponents to stops the administrations of unecessary vaccines! DUHHH question the integrity of those, don't ruin another animal!Also, I bet you didn't realize that even with a bite of a KNOWN RABID ANIMAL, a human has less than 15% of contracting the disease, with post exposure administration of vaccines you do not end up with the disease, PABIESPHOBIA is part of the FEARBASEDPROPAGANDA! "

Ralphinphnx wrote on Apr 17, 2008 12:26 AM:

" Oh well more whining
from the denizens of
the Whine Capitol City
of the Plains,I see
here. So dare I ask if
you whiners ever stop
whining or are ya'll
like the Wyoming Wind
and Just Keep Blowing
Constantly? You could
have Recalled Mayor
Skywalker Spike and
the City Council a
long time ago,if you
were not too busy
whining and too lazy to do so. "

Joe Bainbridge wrote on Apr 16, 2008 6:23 PM:

" As a journalist, I would ask the question of why an administrative impotence requires a vaccination to cure (?).

Does this mean that if we forget to renew our library books we will need a toxic injection?

I would also investigate and call into question whether these vaccines have passed double-blind controlled saftey tests that all other drugs require. (See the PDR for human vaccines. They have not been tested for cancer, mutations or fertility changes). Vet vaccines have lower standards than human vaccines and food animal vaccines have the lowest standards. "

AMBER RENEE wrote on Apr 16, 2008 2:44 PM:

" My dog is EXTREMELY alergic to the rabies vaccine. It causes him to have a seizure everytime. He has to take medication before and after the shot to try and stop the seizure. Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't. He should not have to go through that every year when "there is NO scietific reason to vaccinate every year!!!" It is RIDICULOUS!!!!!!!! "

Cindy wrote on Apr 16, 2008 2:37 PM:

" I've read several comments that state it's sad our animals rely on humans to keep them safe.I think it's even sadder that as humans we must rely on our vets to keep our pets safe.I have educated myself on this topic.We are over vaccinating all of our animals.I have personally experienced many bad reactions,some life threatening.Although there is a handful of vets tryng to bring this issue to the attention of their peers and the public, it has been my experience(to my dismay) that the majority of the vets are much less up to date on this topic than I am (I'm not a vet, it's not even my job to know this stuff!!).Even worse, some are aware of the risks and push over vaccination to line their wallets.Everyone needs to study this problem.Unfortunately, it's not just our animals suffering but our babies and children are over ccinated as well.Get it together people !! Read up !! Scientific studies are out there if you'll just care enough to LOOK FOR IT and READ IT !! "

Kris L. Christine wrote on Apr 16, 2008 1:36 PM:

" Rabies Vaccine--More Information On:

Animal Wellness Magazine Article Vol. 8 Issue 6, How Often Does he REALLY Need A Rabies Shot http://www.animalwellnessmagazine.com/m/m86/main.htm

Rabies Prevention -- United States, 1991 Recommendations of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACIP), Center for Disease Control's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly March 22, 1991 / 40(RR03);1-19 http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00041987.htm ""A fully vaccinated dog or cat is unlikely to become infected with rabies...... In a nationwide study of rabies among dogs and cats in 1988........ no documented vaccine failures occurred among dogs or cats that had received two vaccinations. "

The Rabies Challenge Animal Wise Radio Interview
http://www.animalarkshelter.org/animal/Animal+Wise+Segments.nsf/HighlightsListen?OpenForm&Segment=43AF377786A21CFC862573AC007EE99B" (scroll down to The Rabies Challenge 12/9/07)

The Vaccine Challenge http://www.animaltalknaturally.com/2007/05/01/the-vaccine-challenge-show-91/

US Declared Canine-Rabies Free -- CDC Announces at Inaugural World Rabies Day Symposium http://www.cdc.gov/od/oc/media/pressrel/2007/r070907.htm

The Rabies Challenge Fund http://www.rabieschallengefund.org/page4.html "

Judy Loudin wrote on Apr 16, 2008 1:09 PM:

" Once again Cheyenne is being touted far and wide as out of touch with reality and lacking a concern for the animals of Cheyenne. The article with all of its comments was in my latest digest for Topeka Animal Talk, a Yahoo group which advocates health and safety for animal companions. Now people throughout not only the US, but the world, know that we are sickening our pets for the almighty dollar as our local vets stand by with one hand on the syringe and the other on their checkbooks. Not only do we have local vets to blame, but we have a State Veterinarian who apparently does not keep up with the most recent findings in animal health and veterinary practices. You are now in WY. Turn your clocks back 20 years! Can't think the tourists are going to want to come to WY anymore: it appears the people in charge are suffering froma a terminal case of blatant ignorance and lack of compassion. Nuf said! "

concerned wrote on Apr 16, 2008 1:08 PM:

" There is no reason for over vaccinating our pets.Just another excuse for vets to get richer not thinking about the cosequences.Be truthful and admit that 3 year vaccinations or even longer ,are efficient enough. "

Colorado - Aussie Addict wrote on Apr 16, 2008 12:49 PM:

" I had a young Australian Shepherd have a VERY bad reaction to her second Rabies vaccine. She was NOT given any other meds/vaccines at the same time. You can read her story at http://pinecrestaussies.tripod.com Look on Belle's Memorial Page I ended up putting her to sleep a year or so later. I NO longer vaccinate with anything. There is scientific proof that yearly or triannual Rabies vaccines/vaccines are NOT needed. Dogs/cats can acquire "natural immunity"...by careful exposure to the environment. Please READ the book, Natural Immunity by Pat McKay. "

P. Jordan wrote on Apr 16, 2008 11:35 AM:

" IF the ordiance will not change to reflect the advancement of scientific knowledge, then the ordiance should be help responsible for reimbursing the genetic mutations, the cancer the auto-immune disease,allergies, phobias, seizures,behavioral changes and all other chronic disease that happens as a response to the regulated vaccination with rabies. The good people of Wyoming should help to get the Veteirnary Vaccine Injury Compensation Act set up in your locality to reimburse the people forced into having their pets genes mutated to honor an out of touch and unscientific and non evidence based procedure of yearly rabies vaccination.As a veterinarian, I have a computer full of the research, contact Dr. Dennis Macy on staff at the Colorado Veterinary School for the role rabies vaccines play in the formation of chronic disease in pets. Most of this information is available on the website www.catshots.com yet ANOTHER pet caretaker whom lost his beloved pet to the adverse effects of rabies vaccines.It is unfortunate that people who are ignoratn to the issues are the ones in authority to make laws.personally, I would relish the chance to defend in court the position that all vaccines are not the safe and effective procedure we were bainwashedtobelieve. "

Kris L. Christine wrote on Apr 16, 2008 5:21 AM:

"
CDC's National Association of State Public Health Veterinarian's 2008 COMPENDIUM OF ANIMAL RABIES PREVENTION AND CONTROL http://www.nasphv.org/Documents/RabiesCompendium.pdf "Vaccines used in state and local rabies control programs should have at least a 3-year duration of immunity. ....... No laboratory or epidemiologic data exist to support the annual or biennial administration of 3- or 4-year vaccines following the initial series. ....All vaccines must be administered in accordance with the specifications of the product label or package insert."

American Veterinary Medical Association www.avma.org/products/scientific/biologics.pdf 2007 RABIES VACCINATION PROCEDURES
"For the purpose of standardization of rabies vaccination procedures, the recognized duration of immunity and routes of inoculation of rabies vaccine should be compatible with the recommendations of the Compendium of Animal Rabies Prevention and Control promulgated by the National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians." "

Kris L. Christine wrote on Apr 16, 2008 5:16 AM:

" Readers (hopefully Mayor Spiker and Dr. Cook) who would like to have more information on the rabies and other veterinary vaccines can find excellent data from authoritative sources at the links below:

Duration of Immunity to Canine Vaccines: What We Know and Don't Know, Dr. Ronald Schultz http://www.cedarbayvet.com/duration_of_immunity.htm

What Everyone Needs to Know about Canine Vaccines, Dr. Ronald Schultz http://www.puliclub.org/CHF/AKC2007Conf/What%20Everyone%20Needs%20to%20Know%20About%20Canine%20Vaccines.htm

World Small Animal Veterinary Association 2007 Vaccine Guidelines http://www.wsava.org/SAC.htm Scroll down to Vaccine Guidelines 2007 (PDF)

The 2003 American Animal Hospital Association's Canine Vaccine Guidelines are accessible online at http://www.leerburg.com/special_report.htm

The 2006 American Animal Hospital Association's Canine Vaccine Guidelines are downloadable in PDF format at http://www.aahanet.org/PublicDocumen...s06Revised.pdf

Veterinarian, Dr. Robert Rogers,has an excellent presentation on veterinary vaccines at http://www.newvaccinationprotocols.com/

"

Cora wrote on Apr 15, 2008 1:30 PM:

" I think there is enough scientific data to conclude that the 3 yr. shot is effective. Over - vaccination is a big problem in animals AND people. I believe that in the next few years, we will be hearing a lot more about this. A yearly rabies shot is just NOT NECESSARY!! "

Jan K wrote on Apr 15, 2008 1:06 PM:

" Our beloved pets rely on us to watch out for them. The rabies vaccine is deadly and I have personally witnesed what damage this vaccine can do. There is enough evidence that proves this. Do your homework. Concerned citizen. "

J Evenden wrote on Apr 15, 2008 12:21 PM:

" It is absurd to to be giving annual rabies vaccinations when all the data proves it is just not necessary, notwithstanding the known adverse reactions. There is a reason there exists a 3 year vaccination. Remember, pet owners are voters and when it comes to their pets health and safety there is not a more important issue! The city's bureaucrat's reasons for maintaining the one year protocol are self-serving and ludicrous. Who is running the show anyway, the bureaucrats or the elected officials? It is time to join the 21st century and just do the right thing. "

Animal rescuer wrote on Apr 15, 2008 9:58 AM:

" Ok I am just amazed how much say we really don't have with our own lives. The studies are there they are proven. Yet we have to be at the mercy of the politicians and a director that has just moved to our community. What I don't understand is Mr. Collard has stated that there is not a issue yet, what kind of issue does it have to be in order to have his support. We as pet owners see the problems but yet we can't control it because we are told it is not our choice. We have to get permission to not over vaccinate our dogs. The only conlusion I come up with is, it must be about the money. The more money the veterinarians make, the more money they have to support the politicians. Wow what a deal! "

someone in the know wrote on Apr 15, 2008 9:56 AM:

" It is a sad fact that the reason for the annual rabies shot is that many of Cheyenne's Vets are opposed to licensing, and use the annual rabies shot as a substitute.
If you get your rabies shot at the FE Warren Vet clinic it is good for three years if you have a Colorado address, but only one year if you live in Cheyenne. Same shot different revaccination times, sounds kinda strange huh? "

DJ McMenus wrote on Apr 15, 2008 9:39 AM:

" Good thing I live in the county ehh? I have my dog vaccinated every THREE years because that is what the vaccine label says. "

GEEZ wrote on Apr 15, 2008 8:29 AM:

" The state veterinarian, Dr. Walter Cook. This man sure sounds uninformed!.Could this be another position where the person on paper is qualified but truely isn't? Like most things this is driven by the saying Don't Rock the Boat and GREED. "

Christine Agro, Conscious Animal Radio wrote on Apr 15, 2008 7:10 AM:

" Adverse reactions or not, the bottom line is the USDA has approved effective 3 year rabies vaccines. The American Association of Feline Practitioners,
The American Veterinary Medical Association, The American Animal Hospital Association and 22 American Veterinary Schools all support a 3 year rabies vaccination protocol.

Dr Cook is either uninformed or misinformed but the research and studies are available if he simply consults the JAVMA.

The Rabies Challenge Fund is striving to extend the scientific data to 7 years but regardless of what happens with this study, the fact is a 3 year rabies vaccine does exist and has been approved by the USDA.

It is sad that animals must rely on humans to do the right thing, to be educated and to put their best interest in front of money. A 3 year rabies vaccine exists and has been approved. The primary reason for the current ordinance is compliance and punitive to the people and animals of Cheyenne. Politicians care about getting re-elected so focus your attention and your fight on whomever it is that can change the ordinance and show them they stand to lose. "

Diana Logan wrote on Apr 15, 2008 6:44 AM:

" The rabies vaccination issue is certainly rife with emotion and controversy. As with other decisions in life, this one needs to be based on a risk/benefit assessment. The only way to do this properly with the rabies vaccination issue is to rely on existing established facts and scientific data and to filter out individual opinions and emotions.

At this time, the risks of vaccinating against rabies on an annual basis are great and the benefit is zero (re: Kris Christine's letter, not printed in its entirety).

It is, to use a very apt expression, a no-brainer. It is simply irresponsible and destructive to require annual rabies vaccinations when there is no benefit to be gained. "

Christine Agro, Conscious Animal Radio wrote on Apr 14, 2008 8:28 PM:

" Adverse reactions or not, the bottom line is the USDA has approved effective 3 year rabies vaccines. The American Association of Feline Practitioners,
The American Veterinary Medical Association, The American Animal Hospital Association and 22 American Veterinary Schools all support a 3 year rabies vaccination protocol.

Dr Cook is either uninformed or misinformed but the research and studies are available if he simply consults the JAVMA.

The Rabies Challenge Fund is striving to extend the scientific data to 7 years but regardless of what happens with this study, the fact is a 3 year rabies vaccine does exist and has been approved by the USDA.

It is sad that animals must rely on humans to do the right thing, to be educated and to put their best interest in front of money. A 3 year rabies vaccine exists and has been approved. The primary reason for the current ordinance is compliance and punitive to the people and animals of Cheyenne. Politicians care about getting re-elected so focus your attention and your fight on whomever it is that can change the ordinance and show them they stand to lose.
"

CATHY F BREEDER wrote on Apr 14, 2008 7:31 PM:

" There is so much over vaccinating going on that it is causing severe problems. I have had one puppy have a seziure after his rabies shot and just had to but down a 2nd puppy the developed MG which the immune system turns against its self attacking its own body one week after getting the lyme disease shot. It was a proven fact that the shots in both cases triggered the reaction.
So are they insane with the yearly rabies shots I surely would say yes..

"

Sara Arizona wrote on Apr 14, 2008 5:29 PM:

" Certainly there is an adminstrative way to handle yearly liscencing with 3 year vaccination. To use Arizona as an example, you are sent a yearly liscence renewal knotification and it states whether a vaccine is needed or not. Easy enough - liscense is renewed yearly, vaccination required every 3. I actually totally support titers as means to prove immunity and decrease the rampant overvaccination of our pets. The incidence of K9 cancer is staggering and though there is no scientifically proven studies one has to question all possible causes, extensive overvaccination being one of them. "

Jean B. wrote on Apr 14, 2008 4:40 PM:

" Some vets wouldn't know what an adverse event looks like unless maybe the animal drops dead w/in seconds of being injected with a vax or administered a drug. Once the pet's guardian leaves the vet's office and the pet falls ill and/or dies within the first couple weeks or so, the majority of vets are NOT going to admit that anything they administered could POSSIBLY be the cause of the pet's illness or death. They don't want the risk of being sued or, at the very least, having a disgruntled guardian turn against them, start talking, and possibly take away some of their business.

From experience, it also is evident that a vet will NOT take the necessary steps to report adverse reactions to the FDA and manufacturer.

It's the vet's responsibility to supply guardians with Client Information Sheets which contain possible adverse reactions so that guardians can make an INFORMED choice before allowing their pet to be subject to any vax or drug. A pet's age/health status should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and a decision made between the guardian and vet. Government needs to stay out of it! "

Kris L. Christine wrote on Apr 14, 2008 3:41 PM:

" The state veterinarian, Dr. Walter Cook, seems to be unaware that the national organization of which he is supposed to be a member, the Center for Disease Control’s (CDC) National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians (NASPHV), currently recommends a 3 year rabies vaccination protocol in their 2008 Compendium of Animal Rabies Prevention and Control and has done so since at least 2001. The American Veterinary Medical Association also endorses the NASPHV’s 3 year rabies immunization protocol.

Cheyenne Mayor Jack Spiker and State Public Health Veterinarian, Dr. Cook, should be guided by the recommendations of the CDC’s National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians and the American Veterinary Medical Association to determine the state’s and city’s rabies immunization protocols rather than seeking the advice of local animal shelters and veterinary practitioners to determine appropriate protocols. "

cheryl holmes wrote on Apr 14, 2008 3:31 PM:

" Ridiculous! The state of Wyoming must have a very powerful veterinarian lobby. These shots are only big money makers for vets. Check the net about the dangers of vaccines and the real reasons for them being done annually. You'll find it's the biggest way a vet makes money.

Research has found the shots cause autoimmune illnesses and cancers. Package inserts say not to vaccinate dogs unless they are healthy and under the age of 6. Want to know the truth about vaccines ask any true holistic vet, read the package inserts, research the dangers of vaccines on the net, Dr. Jean Dodds vaccine protocols.
http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUS268&q=Dr.+jean+dodds+vaccine+protocol&btnG=Google+Search

dangers of pet vaccines
http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUS268&q=dangers+of+pet+vaccines&btnG=Google+Search

Insure the death or permanent illness of your pets, have them vaccinated. What to give vets job security by killing your dog, give them vaccines. Guaranteed vet office calls, lots of meds, vet care, expense and agony when they die. "

Mark wrote on Apr 14, 2008 2:52 PM:

" I do not understand why, when in the face of clear scientific research, that shows a 3 yr vaccine is adequate (and in fact not even needed if a blood titer so determines)politicians have the audacity to continue with the absurdity and cruel consequences that are implied by annual vaccinations of this drug. Are these people in the pockets of the pharmaceutical companies that make these drugs? "

Pamela Picard wrote on Apr 14, 2008 2:05 PM:

" The American Veterinary Medical Assoc., the National Assoc. of State Public Health Veterinarians and clinicians at 21 veterinary schools agree; 1) there is no medical reason for re-administering rabies vaccine; 2) there is no increase in antigens; 3) there is increased risk of adverse reactions. When will dog and cat owners stop letting government dictate medical practices that do more harm than good? It's not for the public benefit. It's not for the animals' benefit. Who benefits? Follow the money.
"

Christine wrote on Apr 14, 2008 1:40 PM:

" What state veterinarian would not know that the rabies vaccines labeled 3 YEARS by the manufacturers are already tested and guaranteed to protect for at least 3 years? An animal shelter should respond to barking and stray dogs and not make health policies!!!

The rabies challenge fund is a totally different venture and was started to prove efficacy of the vaccine BEYOND the 3 years covered now. Cheyenne is in fact dreadfully over vaccinating dogs EVERY YEAR with vaccines that may prove to cover 5 years so why not go with the 3 years now where testing has already been established 3 year minimum???

Making the job of AC easier by pumping potentially dangerous vaccines into our dogs is a very poor reason and I am outraged at such casualness toward our pets' health! "

ANN wrote on Apr 14, 2008 1:08 PM:

" I HAVE BEEN RAISING PUPPPIES FOR OVER 16 YEARS AND I NEVER GIVE MY ADULTS OVER 2 YEARS OLD SHOTS--THEY DO NOT NEED THEM AND IT IS DANGEROUS TO GIVE THEM.."how many smallpox shots have you had?""how old were you and what did you weigh?" "why dont you have one every year?" MY POINT MADE. "

Lynne Van House wrote on Apr 14, 2008 12:25 PM:

" If animal abuse can be construed as: purposely doing something to an animal that is unneccesary for it's health or detrimental to it's well-being; then MOST CERTAINLY giving a vaccine with proven adverse side effects, (that does NOT have any need to be given oftener than every 3 years) EVERY year--falls into that category! (be it animal shelter, Vets, or anybody else that administers it).
Regardless if the Vets choose to refuse to see adverse side effects that happen at a later date as "related"--the above fact still remains!
If WILD animals get Rabies; that's to be expected. Wild animals are of course not vaccinated. BUT ALL domestic pet animals have SOME titer garnered from their mother's immunity; just as ALL dogs in the US, regardless of any vaccination--have some immunity to Parvo. It's already proven that too many vaccines are detrimental to our childen's health--and they are more closely monitered than animal vaccines! WHEN are we going to wake up and start protecting our pets as we do our kids? "

V. Jones wrote on Apr 14, 2008 10:52 AM:

" Can you say MORON REDNECK and Cook in the say breath?
I can! "

Kris H wrote on Apr 14, 2008 10:34 AM:

" You have to be kidding with this LAW. It's not about the pets at all. It's about the Money that the vets make giving these UNNESSARY VACCINATIONS. VETS DO NOT REPORT ADVERSE REACTIONS TO OFFICALS. If they did the count would be a lot higher. Out of 4 cats 2 cats got VACCINE ASSOCIATED SARCOMA. THAT IS 50% in my household alone. YOU NEED TO GET THE FACTS RIGHT and you will not get the facts right dealing with people like local vets and MR COOK who no nothing at all about ADVERSE REACTIONS. ARE PETS ARE BEING KILLED AT THE HANDS OF THE LAW and the Law will change and the proof will be made known that rabies vaccines can last more then 7 YEARS. IT"S CLear that you people do not do THE RESEARCH ON this SUBJECT. IF you did, you will be doing a VERY different DANCE. I don't know how any of you can go to bed at night knowing that you are responsible for taking the lives of our kids (pets). "

Rachel Finlay wrote on Apr 14, 2008 10:29 AM:

" I am stunned to read about communities such as Cheyenne today - 2008. I am not sure what it will take to get public officials, who hold the responsibility to be familiar with and current on the science behind their role, to act on the known positions of not only the scientific community but the National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians (NASPHV), American Animal Hospital Association’s , and the American Veterinary Medical Association to make informed policy that is in the best interest of pets.

Cheyenne Mayor Jack Spiker and State Public Health Veterinarian, Dr. Cook are acting extremely irresponsibly and do not realize how ignorant their position on this issue appears to the country right now.

In another time, Mr. Spiker and Mr. Cook may have led the way for the "Flat Earth" movement crucifying all those who dare suggest the earth is round.

It's time to stop protecting the status quo and step up, willing to acknowledge bad policy that is hurting animals without providing added security for society, and change it. "

Jennifer wrote on Apr 14, 2008 9:42 AM:

" I have had known several people whose animals have had adverse reaction to vaccines. In the state I come from our county tag was purchased for the 3 years. The amount of the tag was less if your animal was spayed or neutered.
Have there been several rabies outbreaks in states where they are only required to vaccinate every 3 years? Or have the vets in those staes gone broke? "

dogshowperson wrote on Apr 14, 2008 9:35 AM:

" If you go to the rabies compendium it will state there that the rabies shot is good for 3 years and give guidelines to follow for communities and vets. It in my mind malpractice to vaccinate a dog or cat more often than the vaccine recommends and facts support. Go to http://www.in.gov/boah/rabies/rabiescompendium2008.pdf to read this for yourself. Also send copies of this report to every city council member and let them read it for themselves. THEN ask them to justify requiring vaccinations more often. They need to be educated! "

PaulW wrote on Apr 14, 2008 8:34 AM:

" If most counties (Teton, for example), and the state have regulations only requiring that animal registrations be updated when the vaccine needs to be readministerd according to the manufacturer, why does the City of Cheyenne feel the need to place this undue burden upon its citizens? Vaccinations and registration are not cheap, and we are not so illiterate that we cannot determine when we will need to get them renewed. I'm afraid I have to side with Ms. Volk in questioning the motives of the decision makers involved. In my opinion, there is no sound, logical reason to maintain the status quo. "

sporker wrote on Apr 14, 2008 7:55 AM:

" Mayor Jack Spiker responded that he will take guidance from the leaders at the Cheyenne Animal Shelter.

"The pain I felt - those dogs loved me to the day they died." At that, he burst into tears and was quiet for a few minutes.

Laybourn asked him about religious opposition to microchipping. One citizen said he opposed it because he considered it as the “mark of the beast.”

Shelter director Rick Collord said he’s familiar with that point of view.

He began to feel hatred toward his fellow human beings because it was their irresponsible behavior that landed these animals in the shelter.

He was never arrested, or even scolded, for his bad behavior. But it haunted him for years.

Collord even came out about his checkered past a few years ago. He said he gave a talk to 300 people in Oregon about how he beat his dogs in childhood and in his early teens. This led to him being a featured guest on the Montel Williams show in an episode about animal cruelty - but he used only his first name on the show.

April 14th Fool Day!
"

Kris L. Christine wrote on Apr 14, 2008 4:29 AM:

" The Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 4/1/08 article "Postmarketing Surveillance of Rabies Vaccines for Dogs to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy" states that between 4/1/04 and 3/31/07, "NEARLY 10,000 ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS (all animal species) WERE RECEIVED BY MANUFACTURERS OF RABIES VACCINES..........Approximately 65% of the manufacturer's reports involved DOGS......Rabies vaccines are the most common group of biological products identified in adverse event reports received by the Center for Veterinary Biologics."

Veterinarians are NOT required to report adverse reactions, which the World Small Animal Veterinary Association stated in 2007 there is: "GROSS UNDER-REPORTING OF VACCINE-ASSOCIATED ADVERSE EVENTS which impedes knowledge of the ongoing safety of these products." An article entitled, A New Approach to Reporting Medication and Device Adverse Effects and Product Problems, (JAMA 6/2/93 Vol.269 No.21) Dr. David Kessler, former head of the Food & Drug Administration, declared "ONLY ABOUT 1% OF SERIOUS EVENTS ARE REPORTED TO THE FDA."

In light of the 10,000 adverse reactions to the rabies vaccine in the JAVMA report, 65% of which were in dogs, and the estimated 1% reporting of "serious" means the actual number of dogs with adverse reactions would be more like 650,000.
"

T. Burke wrote on Apr 13, 2008 9:08 PM:

" Veterinarians derive a substantial percentage of their total incomes from vaccinating dogs and cats, and apparently those veterinarians practicing within the city limits of Cheyenne who are not speaking out against this this outrageous ordinance are doing so in order to reap the benefits that the annual rabies revaccinations are going to generate in additional revenue.
My guess is that the Cheyenne Kennel Club which has put on All-Breed dog shows for years, won't be attracting many exhibitors and the revenue that they bring to the city as a result of this.

"

Karon Volk wrote on Apr 13, 2008 7:06 PM:

" Seems Cheyenne experts in Cheyenne know more than the vaccine manufacturers who, right on the lable, guarantee immunity for 3 years, they know better than other countries, other states, cities, counties. Perhaps Dr. Cook ought to read a rabies vaccine label, where it outlines possible adverse reactions. He might also be interested in knowing that the one year vaccine and the three year vaccine contain exactly the same ingredients - only the label is different. Frightening that our animal shelter is making the laws that affect our pets. "

J. JHalpern wrote on Apr 13, 2008 6:37 PM:

" In 1992, it was demonstrated that rabies vaccination conferred immunity for at least 5 years. Studies are now under way at the U of Wisconsin to determine long term immunity. (http://www.rabieschallengefund.org/files/RCF%20STUDIES%20STARTED%20Press%20Release.pdf
The vaccine companies label their product as good for 3 years. Annual vaccination is redundant and contrary to your article causes significant dangerous side effects. "

Animal rescuer wrote on Apr 13, 2008 6:00 PM:

" "Shelter director Rick Collard said, "We have not had anything that shows there's an issue here in this community. The shelter is busy responding to barking or stray dogs or breeding cat complaints in the city, he said.We're a bit overwhelmed with those kinds of complaints right now," he said"
Too overwhelmed to consider the health of the pets who live in the city of Cheyenne. Go back where you came from, Rick. You are still killing more than you are sending to rescues. The people have been hoodwinked by the shelter board once again. Now we have a self proclaimed animal abuser running the shelter. Nothing has changed! "

Animal rescuer wrote on Apr 13, 2008 5:52 PM:

" "Those include:... identification and registration of the animals; and ensuring that residents don't forget to vaccinate."
What do you think we are? Idiots? If you have a three year vaccine, you have your pets records, and it isn't rocket science to remember that it is time for new vacc's. So because the Mayor and Council thinks we are incompetent, we can continue to sicken our animal companions and line the pockets of unscrupulous veterinarians who KNOW THAT THEY ARE PUTTING ANIMALS AT RISK WITH OVER VACCINATION. As far as identification, leave it as a yearly renewal. Send the folks a postcard and remind them if necessary, but don't kill the dogs and cause them health issues to "keep track of them".
To Walter Cook:
"Cook said vets are required to report any side effects so the vaccine can be studied. He would be "absolutely shocked," he said, if any doctors were putting animals at risk just to make a profit." Come on Walter, did you just fall off the potato wagon? You know darn good and well many vets are in it for the MONEY! That is why they choose that profession. Get real! "

EmilyS wrote on Apr 13, 2008 1:46 PM:

" "the studies that are being done now might prove the vaccine need not be -- or shouldn't be -- administered every year.

Cook said that after those are complete, the National Association of State Public Health Veterinarians may test and accept the results of those studies."

Cook needs to be FIRED for being either 1) ignorant and/or 2) a liar. There are ALREADY studies that prove that the rabies vax is good for at least 3 years. The current study may determine that it is good for 5-7 years. There is NO scientific reason to vaccinate every year.

Why is the new director of Animal Control determining Cheyenne's vaccination policy anyway?

Spiker needs to get some brains or some spine. Or pehaps someone to run against him.


"

Leave Your Comments

(optional)
Current Word Count:
   

There is a 200 word limitation per post

Comments are not posted until after being approved by WTE staff.

Comments may be rejected by the WTE staff at their discretion.

The comments posted on the Reader Comments section are not necessarily those of the WTE.

If you would like to report an offensive post, please contact us.


Advertisement