Kids in jail: Are we creating monsters?
By Bill McCarthy
bmccarthy@wyomingnews.com
CHEYENNE -- Wyoming jails children at a rate 2½ times the national average -- and 74 percent of those are locked up for non-violent offenses.
Only South Dakota holds children in trouble at a higher rate.
That’s according to the Kids Count 2008 report compiled by the Annie E. Casey Foundation.
“This is an area of very great concern to us,” said Deanna Frey of the Wyoming Children’s Action Alliance.
In 2006, Wyoming committed 334 youths to custody, ages 10-15, for every 100,000; South Dakota committed 373. The national average was 125.
The Children’s Action Alliance has authority over Kids Count in
Continued from A1
Wyoming, and it hosted a news conference here Thursday with child-welfare advocates on hand to discuss the findings.
Especially troubling, said Beth Evans, who works on juvenile issues for the Wyoming County Commissioners Association, is the large number of children who are held in this state for nonviolent offenses. The national average is 66 percent.
For the most part they are being held for “typical obnoxious teen misbehavior,” she said. That includes underage drinking and marijuana use.
The money spent to hold them would be better used to provide treatment and services that will keep them out of jail, she said.
Wyoming is the only state that doesn’t take part in the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974, said Bob Mayor of St. Joseph’s Children’s Home, a private youth treatment facility in Torrington.
The federal law sets standards for locking up people under 18. Many Wyoming children in trouble with the law are tried in adult courts and sent to adult jails for relatively minor crimes, the experts said. That is in violation of the federal standards.
It’s no excuse that Wyoming is a rural state, Mayor added, since Alaska complies as do other states with remote, isolated areas.
“The Equality State we are not when it comes to juvenile justice in this state,” Mayor said.
Added Bob Quick of the Division of Juvenile Services: “The whole issue of incarceration is a black eye on what is otherwise an exemplary system.”
There are many good programs available and used well once children are assigned to them, he said.
But getting a child from the point of being taken into custody, into the appropriate court and to the appropriate program has been a problem. Often, he said, police and prosecutors are forced to make decisions about children that they’re not qualified to make and not comfortable making.
Quick and the other youth advocates said they are hopeful about a state program that is creating county-level, juvenile-service boards to assess needs of individual children as soon as possible after they are picked up.
But Tony Lewis, director of Family Services, said the service boards are no magic bullet.
Resources vary across the state as do philosophies about dealing with children in trouble, he said.
Reader Comments
solution wrote on Jun 19, 2008 3:04 PM:
DM wrote on Jun 19, 2008 3:38 AM:
shud up wrote on Jun 18, 2008 11:26 PM:
Someone slap Ralph please wrote on Jun 18, 2008 11:16 PM:
Oye! "
Ruth wrote on Jun 18, 2008 1:16 PM:
Ulysses wrote on Jun 18, 2008 8:00 AM:
Kid's today are coddled to the point wherein they live in an alternate reality where the world is made to serve them instead of vice versa. They have no grasp of the consequences of acting incorrectly in our society, lessons that seem to have fallen off of the Parent Curriculum.
Then the negative influences. Kid's emulate the culture that they see. When a kid hears Gangster rap for example, they emulate the "Gangster" lifestyle which has been glamorized by the music industry.
When parents, and American Society in General start taking a hard look at how their children are being influenced, and raised we will find children whom understand the consequences of their actions. Until then, if a child commits an act of criminal intent then they should be punished. There should be no get out of jail card for kids that commit the act of murder. "
Ralphinphnx wrote on Jun 17, 2008 11:05 PM:
little monsters and
teach them that if you
do the crime then you
will do the crime. "
to mememe wrote on Jun 17, 2008 10:08 PM:
A Citizen wrote on Jun 17, 2008 9:11 PM:
mememe-Santos R. wrote on Jun 17, 2008 6:07 PM:
mememe wrote on Jun 17, 2008 5:56 PM:
Santos R. "
Thank god wrote on Jun 17, 2008 11:34 AM:
katie bear wrote on Jun 17, 2008 11:21 AM:
But what about wrote on Jun 17, 2008 8:44 AM:
Or not? "
foxyangel wrote on Jun 17, 2008 4:00 AM:
TO stupid cheyenne adults wrote on Jun 17, 2008 3:51 AM:
To Karen wrote on Jun 17, 2008 3:39 AM:
To Draxis Axhand aka DAVE wrote on Jun 17, 2008 3:37 AM:
Frustrated wrote on Jun 17, 2008 3:27 AM:
My kids were doing just fine until they were being picked on by teachers, school bus driver and the principle. Then it's left up to us parents to try our best to get our child through this. They don't understand why they get into trouble for something they didn't do. I have proof that this has happened & all I got was an appology, my kids didn't get anything. Now with all this that has happened, one of my kids have had a very hard time in school and ended up with medical problems due to the stress from it all. A CHINS was filed for my child missing too much school due to sever medical problems. All I'm trying to tell all of you dumb whitted people that want to put the blame on the parents, is there are others that influence our children too. Parents can only do so much or YES they can be removed from the home! "
To grizzled old man wrote on Jun 17, 2008 3:26 AM:
To realist wrote on Jun 17, 2008 3:14 AM:
know it all cheyenne wrote on Jun 17, 2008 3:04 AM:
know it all cheyenne wrote on Jun 17, 2008 2:48 AM:
RENAROSE continued.. wrote on Jun 17, 2008 2:17 AM:
RENAROSE wrote on Jun 17, 2008 2:08 AM:
mememe wrote on Jun 16, 2008 11:50 PM:
To Grizzeled Old Mam wrote on Jun 16, 2008 3:14 PM:
to David wrote on Jun 16, 2008 12:15 PM:
To Amazed wrote on Jun 16, 2008 12:14 PM:
Mom of Teen wrote on Jun 16, 2008 11:43 AM:
To Reality wrote on Jun 16, 2008 9:16 AM:
mememe wrote on Jun 16, 2008 5:51 AM:
I wonder wrote on Jun 15, 2008 10:36 PM:
high for Barney and Mr. R wrote on Jun 15, 2008 10:01 PM:
To bad Mr Rogers is dead, some reruns of him might scare some of these thugs straight.
Isn't that right boys and girls, will you be my friend? "
David wrote on Jun 15, 2008 8:11 PM:
You are wrong, Wyoming, does not take part in the JJA.
We are not "not in compliance."
Wyoming chooses not to be a part of it.
You would have to be part of the program to be "not in compliance.
The JJA is just another stupid piece of legislation that breeds crime.
The punishment is supposed to fit the crime, it doesn't matter if the criminal is 12 or 85.
That's why we have these problems, criminals are treated with kid gloves and get an automatic clean slate when they're 18. "
Reality wrote on Jun 15, 2008 11:17 AM:
Think about this, your driving down the road, the guy behind you is smoking cannibis. He tailgates like most drivers in cheyenne. Then, someone thinking they own the streets, walks in front of your car. You slam on the brakes to try not to hit them. The guy on cannibus isn't gonna react to your sudden stop for another 100 feet and your vehicle is gonna keep going up to 150-200 feet after he slammed on his breaks, assuming whats going on even registers. Cannibus causes slowed reaction times and hinders one to think clearly. I've seen people on the stuff, it is not harmless. I know a person who smoked so much the only thing she knows how to say anymore in a conversation is "wow, that's cool man" and her daughter has an enlarged brain and skull. Is behind on walking and multiple aspects of childhood development. Don' go around saying a drug is harmless until you do your homework and know what you are talking about. I don't want anyone driving who's high behind the wheel of a car. "
stuff it wrote on Jun 14, 2008 3:36 PM:
Realist wrote on Jun 14, 2008 7:02 AM:
The fix in the mix wrote on Jun 14, 2008 5:34 AM:
too many rights. The educational system should be a system devoted to training and study not the socialization and the teaching of individual needs and wants. Children are in
school for a purpose it is high time that more attention is paid to keeping them in school and not promoting alternate arrangements where their learning is concerned. Parents are responsible yes but there are other forces in our state and federal government that must be addressed to fix this problem. IMHO "
Draxis Axhand aka Dave wrote on Jun 14, 2008 12:38 AM:
mememe wrote on Jun 13, 2008 10:45 PM:
mememe wrote on Jun 13, 2008 10:32 PM:
blow it out youre kazoo wrote on Jun 13, 2008 8:29 PM:
A Former LA cop wrote on Jun 13, 2008 5:46 PM:
LC wrote on Jun 13, 2008 2:41 PM:
seriously wrote on Jun 13, 2008 2:15 PM:
DFS and the court stuff any new program they don't have to pay for. Even if the child is not appropriate.
Would you put your "gifted" child in a school for mentally challenged students--NO. Same thing here. They place kids at Normative Services, who will keep the kid extended periods of time just to play sports, The boys' school to "teach them a lesson" etc...FCS or Wardle Academy when all else fails.
Worst part of this, supervisors at DFS like Deb Harrington will not even listen to staff concerns. "
Amazed wrote on Jun 13, 2008 2:08 PM:
Katie Bear wrote on Jun 13, 2008 1:39 PM:
Bob the Builder wrote on Jun 13, 2008 1:13 PM:
Grizzeled Old Man wrote on Jun 13, 2008 12:53 PM:
Urban Guerrilla wrote on Jun 13, 2008 12:45 PM:
Not the system wrote on Jun 13, 2008 11:47 AM:
NO wrote on Jun 13, 2008 11:42 AM:
Dan wrote on Jun 13, 2008 11:18 AM:
GoWho wrote on Jun 13, 2008 10:25 AM:
Why Not wrote on Jun 13, 2008 10:20 AM:
Dont get me wrong jail is a little extreme for some of the crimes so the other alternative should be public humiliation. Have them out there in chain gains in bright pink or yellow jump suits cleaning ditches, sidewalks, painting public buildings and parks. Public Service options would be a big difference because these kids dont know how to do real work. All they do is get into trouble, play video games, and sit around. If they had to work off their sentences they probably would not do the crime and think about what they did. "
You Know WHo--I still know more than you wrote on Jun 13, 2008 9:27 AM:
average joe wrote on Jun 13, 2008 9:22 AM:
If a kid is reformable, non violent and just impulsive and idiotic like most kids is it right to throw them in with real scum? This is a real concern since most who end up in prision are more likely to be life long criminals,after all you are who you associate with even if your associations are not by choice. "
Joseph wrote on Jun 13, 2008 9:20 AM:
Karen wrote on Jun 13, 2008 9:06 AM:
no wrote on Jun 13, 2008 9:05 AM:
TS wrote on Jun 13, 2008 9:02 AM:
JIm F wrote on Jun 13, 2008 8:51 AM:
How effective is the current system handling juvenile cases? Give us some stats on repeat offenders. What does law enforcement have to say? How does this info stack up against the stats from other states? "
Patrick J. Leslie wrote on Jun 13, 2008 8:39 AM:
Pat W wrote on Jun 13, 2008 7:30 AM:
Leave Your Comments
|
There is a 200 word limitation per post Comments are not posted until after being approved by WTE staff. Comments may be rejected by the WTE staff at their discretion. The comments posted on the Reader Comments section are not necessarily those of the WTE. If you would like to report an offensive post, please contact us. |




Ralphinphnx wrote on Jun 20, 2008 11:59 PM:
Ralph please? Sorry
about that and yes I
know Baretta said,
"If you can't do the
time,then don't do the
crime"okay now? I say
throw the little brats
into a Tent City Jail
and Put Them To Work
on A Chain Gang,and Feed them green baloney and water and
no tv and watch how
fast they shape up after you expose them
to America's Toughest
Sheriff Joe Methods!
Stop Pampering Them! "